Please
read this information
and send this URL to all you can..
.
What's all the fuss with the Real ID Act
about?
President Bush signed an $82 billion
military spending bill
that, in part, created electronically readable, federally approved
ID cards for all Americans. The House of Representatives
overwhelmingly approved the package--which includes the Real ID Act.
What does that mean for me?
Starting in May of 2008, if you live or work in the United States,
you'll need a federally approved ID card to travel on an airplane,
train, open a bank account, collect Social Security payments, or
take advantage of nearly any government service. Practically
speaking, your driver's license likely will have to be reissued to
meet federal standards.
The Real ID Act hands the Department of Homeland Security the
power to set these standards and determine whether state drivers'
licenses and other ID cards pass muster. Only ID cards approved by
Homeland Security can be accepted "for any official purpose" by the
feds.
How will I get one of these new ID cards?
You'll still get one through your state motor vehicle agency, and it
will take the place of your drivers' license. But the identification
process will be more rigorous.
For instance, you'll need to bring a "photo identity document,"
document your birth date and address, and show that your Social
Security number is what you had claimed it to be. U.S. citizens will
have to prove that status, and foreigners will have to show a valid
visa.
State DMVs will have to verify that these identity documents are
legitimate, digitize them and store them permanently. In addition,
Social Security numbers must be verified with the Social Security
Administration.
What's going to be stored on this ID card?
At a minimum: name, birth date, sex, ID number, a digital
photograph, address, and a "common machine-readable technology" that
Homeland Security will decide on. The card must also sport "physical
security features designed to prevent tampering, counterfeiting, or
duplication of the document for fraudulent purposes."
Homeland Security is permitted to add additional requirements
as needed--such as a fingerprint or retinal scan--on top of
those. We won't know for a while what these additional requirements
will be.
Why did these ID requirements get attached to an "emergency"
military spending bill?
Because it's difficult for politicians to vote against money that
will go to the troops in Iraq and tsunami relief. The
funds cover
ammunition, weapons, tracked combat vehicles, aircraft, troop
housing, death benefits, and so on. The House already approved a
standalone
version of the Real
ID
The Real ID Act says federally accepted ID cards must be "machine
readable," and lets Homeland Security determine the details. That
will being a radio frequency identification (RFID) chip.
In the past, Homeland Security has indicated it likes the concept
of RFID chips. The State Department is already going to be embedding
RFID devices in passports, and Homeland Security wants to issue RFID-outfitted
IDs to foreign visitors who enter the country at the Mexican and
Canadian borders. The agency plans to start a yearlong test of the
technology in July at checkpoints in Arizona, New York and
Washington state.
Will state DMVs share this information?
Yes. In exchange for federal cash, states must agree to link up
their databases. Specifically, the Real ID Act says it hopes to
"provide electronic access by a state to information contained in
the motor vehicle databases of all other states."
Is this legislation a done deal?
Pretty much. The House of Representatives approved the package by a
vote of 368-58.
Only three of the "nay" votes were Republicans; the rest were
Democrats.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan has told reporters "the
president supports" the standalone Real ID Act, and the Bush
administration has come out with an
official endorsement.
As far back as July 2002, the Bush administration has been talking
about assisting
Who were the three Republicans who voted against it?
Reps.
warned that the
Real ID Act "establishes a national ID card" and "gives authority to
the Secretary of Homeland Security to unilaterally add
requirements as he sees fit."
Is this a national ID card?
It depends on whom you ask. Barry Steinhardt, director of the
American Civil Liberties Union's technology and liberty program,
says: "It's going to result in everyone, from the 7-Eleven store to
the bank and airlines, demanding to see the ID card. They're going
to scan it in. They're going to have all the data on it from the
front of the card...It's going to be not just a national ID card but
a national database."
At the moment, state driver's licenses aren't easy for bars,
banks, airlines and so on to swipe through card readers because
they're not uniform; some may have barcodes but no magnetic stripes,
for instance, and some may lack both. Steinhardt predicts the
federalized IDs will be a gold mine for government agencies and
marketers. Also, he notes that the Supreme Court
ruled last year
that police can demand to see ID from law-abiding U.S. citizens.
Will it be challenged in court?
Maybe. "We're exploring whether there are any litigation
possibilities here," says the ACLU's Steinhardt.
One possible legal argument would challenge any requirement for a
photograph on the ID card as a violation of religious freedom. A
second would argue that the legislation imposes costs on states
without properly reimbursing them.
When does it take effect?
The Real ID Act takes effect "three years after the date of the
enactment" of the legislation. So its effective date is in May 2008.
And he causes all,
the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men
and the slaves, to be given mark in their right hand, or in their
forehead, and he provides that no one should be able to buy or sell,
except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast, or the
number of his name. Revelation 13:16
Let him who has understanding
calculate the number of the beast for the number is that of a man, and
his number is 666. Revelation 13:18
SO
WHAT CAN I DO?
Please make the commitment today that you will not
accept the Real ID (National ID) Card, There very well may be man made crises
that is set to
accelerate the need to unite and surrender our rights, privacy,
freedoms, and properties for so-called "peace and security."
Circumstances are far beyond what most people are aware of in the race
toward a One World Government. The first thing that you should do is
take 1 hr and 49 minutes and watch this documentary from Aaron Russo.
Follow along with him as the truth unfolds before you. Tap on the image
below to watch for free on Google video.
ARGUMENTS
IN OPPOSITION
Identity cards will impose a disproportionate burden upon citizens
while empowering the executive, which is contrary to the maxim: "the
government that governs best, governs least". Some have pointed out
that extensive
lobbying for identity cards has been undertaken, in countries
without compulsory identity cards, by IT companies who will be likely
to reap rich benefits in the event of an identity card scheme being
implemented.
Cards could be used to track anyone's movements and private life,
thus endangering
privacy.
The proposed British ID card will involve a series of linked
databases, to be managed by the private sector. Managing disparate
linked systems using a range of institutions and any number of
personnel is alleged to be a security disaster in the making.[1]
A requirement to carry an identity card at all times
can lead to the inconvenience of arbitrary requests from card
controllers (such as the
police).
This can lead to
functionality creep whereby carrying a card becomes de
facto if not de jure
compulsory, as in the case of
Social Security numbers, which are now widely used as ID.
Government claims that identity cards will prevent
terrorism may not be based in fact. The former UK
Home Secretary
Charles Clarke conceded that identity cards may only be useful in
the identification of bodies in the aftermath of a terrorist attack.
Critics rely on the facts that the terrorists involved in
9/11 and
the
London tube attacks did have and would have had identity cards,
respectively. As a strong presumption of identity is given in favour
of a card holder, the identity card scheme might be an asset to
potential terrorists.
Historically,
totalitarian governments which issued identity cards to citizens
used them oppressively. For example,
Nazis
made use of unique biometric identities by tattooing identification
numbers on the arms of
Final Solution concentration-camp detainees.
In many cases, other forms of documentation such as a
driver's license,
passport, or
Medicare card serve a similar function, and thus an ID card is not
needed.
Without the Real ID (National ID) Card you will not be
able to go into a Federal building, get on a plane or train, open a
bank account, and since it is taking the place of your drivers license
you won't be able to legally drive a motor vehicle in the United
States of America. Your employer will have to (by Federal law) prove
that you are a US citizen by photo copying your Real ID card and have
it on file as proof of your identity. Of course that is just the
beginning to get you started. Don't think for one second that it will
stop there.
Homeland Security is permitted to add additional requirements
as needed. Of course we don't know what those additional requirements
will be. Yea right... It reminds me of the frog slowly being warmed
up in the pot of water. Can you feel the water getting hot America?
What are you going to do about it?